Forums About Latvian Girls And Around
kazimirina35 rainelde yuta monvida35 Beatrisa zenona
 | Forums | FREE Sign Up | Polls | Reply | Search Forums | Forums Statistics | About This Project | Play Facemash!
Anything Forums About Latvian Girls And Around / Anything /

Anti Russian Rhetoric - Paranoia or...?

jorobert63 Profile Pictures: 3
Male Forums Member 
#1 | Posted: 30 Aug 2017 07:04 | Edited by: jorobert63
There is today a significant anti Russian rhetoric sweeping through eastern Europe. This is the result of a well orchestrated political & media narrative, orchestrated in great part by the U.S. creating and constantly feeding the narrative of an imminent Russian invasion. The sanctions that have subsequently been applied to the Russian economy by the U.S. has brought greater political and economic harm more to countries such as Latvia, that previously were wholly dependent on positive econimc and political ties with Russia. As an employer of Latvians and other eastern Europeans including some Russians, I find that there is a mixed regard for relations with Russia. However, the few Latvians I am familiar with have rather stronger anti Russian opinions and consequently prefer that Latvia is under the protectorate of NATO & the EU rather than the oppressive influences of Russia. Perhaps my question/post is rather boring and I apologise in advance if I have sent you to sleep. But I am interested in political developments within the European Union and it interests me to know better the views and opinions of everyday Latvians "on the ground" who will most be affected by the decisions of their MEPs and national politicians. Thank you for your time and consideration of my post. John.
#2 | Posted: 5 Sep 2017 04:34
Considering the history I'd be suspect of Russia also.
1991 I believe Latvia got independence again- stuff all.
Personally I'd distance myself from America also though I suppose the baltics need to be seen with big back up.
It is interesting and hard to understand for me being Australian but I've read on the subject quite alot and Russia/ussr did some dodgy stuff.
jorobert63 Profile Pictures: 3
Male Forums Member 
#3 | Posted: 5 Sep 2017 10:17
I agree. But if Russia is doing some "dodgy stuff" then the US is doing some real shit! Question is with all the fanfare and talk of US supporting Europe through NATO and the EU, who send gas to Latvia? Texas
Male Admin 
#4 | Posted: 6 Sep 2017 21:22
Well, if we take the Anti Russian Rhetoric up (again!), then we need to consider just 3 things:

- Russia is the biggest country in the world by its territory - and it's not a coincidence;

- Russia develops the nuclear weapons on its own - one of the rare things which are developed exclusively in Russia - and it's not a coincidence;

- Russia owns the biggest reserve of internal fossils which are NECESSARY for the human kind - incl. fresh water, oil, gas, charcoal etc. - and this is the *primary* interest of US and EU, and it always was.

So Latvia, as many other countries, is the neighbor of the biggest country of the world with the biggest reserve of human resources. The neighbor. Then why Latvia tends to be closer with US which is on the opposite side of the world? NATO? EU? The answer is simple: because of political corruption.

When USSR was broken, the official power in Latvia was gained by so called "Family of 100" mafia. Their names and surnames are disputed in media since then all the time. No new faces in politics in 27 years of "independence", no young faces. The political power all belongs to the same corrupted "family" and its "relatives". Yes, Latvia is the 3rd world country.

And this "family" is fully "bought/purchased" by the US government and EU institutions (as soon as EU is bought by US, too). So when we talk why Latvia goes against its biggest and richest neighbor, it's not what the Latvian people want, it's what the Latvian corrupted politicians want. The answer is simple: money. And even not such big money you could imagine, 'cause Latvia is small, and the corrupted group of politicians is small, too.

So, there's no war, no protests - because there are not so many people who'd like to risk their lives for corruption. Actually most of people don't even concentrate on sanctions. Most people of Latvia are trying to survive each day and thinking about where to earn more money and how to shag the government not paying taxes.
#5 | Posted: 10 Sep 2017 11:14
Excellent commentary. I suspected as much. But preferred to read it from someone with a better insight. It's a shame because the only people that suffer the politicians corruption are the average Latvian man and woman. While their puppet politicians repeat the same old bullshit anti Russian rhetoric, does the US send supplies to the Latvian people after sanctions are applied to their largest economic neighbour? To be fair, this anti Russian narrative is not only coming from Latvia but also from practically all EU nations. So, what does that tell us? That all EU governments are taking large cash filled envelopes at the end of each month? Madness.
Male Admin 
#6 | Posted: 22 Sep 2017 23:24
But preferred to read it from someone with a better insight.

You did hope for true politicians on ths forum?

It's a shame because the only people that suffer the politicians corruption are the average Latvian man and woman.

Not just Latvian... I'd suppose all people on Earth.

While their puppet politicians repeat the same old bullshit anti Russian rhetoric, does the US send supplies to the Latvian people after sanctions are applied to their largest economic neighbor?

The answer is no. US sends just their military forces to this land. We only could suppose that this army is build against the local inhabitants,so they are not up to any protest... not someone outside of the border. It's not serious to see these old tanks and outdated military powers to "say something" against Russia.

So, what does that tell us? That all EU governments are taking large cash filled envelopes at the end of each month?

Exactly. I believe this all is done just because of big printed paper.
Male Forums Member 
#7 | Posted: 8 Feb 2018 10:52
It is a interesting topic indeed! From my point of view, and I don't want to be called a "doom prophet", but I think both Russia and the West want to have Latvia as a vital point and route for World War 3, and maybe to attack Israel with the battle of Armageddon....?
We are living in a very interesting and unpredictable timeframe of our lives. The elite of the world (politicians, powerful and influential business people and corporations, secret and intelligence agencies, etc.) are part of the New World Order, like an "octopus" who's got it's tentacles wrapped around every nation, every country and every continent: controling and manipulating everywhere 24/7.
Male Admin 
#8 | Posted: 20 Feb 2018 19:24
I think both Russia and the West want to have Latvia as a vital point and route for World War 3, and maybe to attack Israel with the battle of Armageddon....?

In World War 3 there will be no routes anymore. Whoever turns on the atomic bomb first, will see the big yellow mushroom from his window. Latvia is just a fully dependent micro-country with the dying economics and decreasing population. No weapons are needed to take this country. Ruin its banking system and voila, Latvia will have a new master.

Actually something happens these days...


‘A nightmare’: Banker tells tale of Latvian corruption

Latvia’s top banking official explained the “rules of the game” for successful banking in the small European country. His sidekick sat the owner of Norvik bank down, scribbling the sum on a piece of paper: 100,000 euros ($125,000) a month.

An international complaint filed by Latvian bank Norvik alleges that a “Senior Latvian Official” repeatedly sought “to extort monetary bribes” and retaliated against the bank when its owners refused to pay up. The 39-page claim, filed before a World Bank arbitration body, did not name the Latvian official.

That person is Ilmārs Rimšēvičs (Ilmars Rimsevics), Norvik bank officials told The Associated Press.

Rimsevics, the country’s top banking official and a key member of the European Central Bank, was detained Saturday amid swirling accusations of bribery and money laundering schemes in Latvia that reach back to Russia.

He was released on bail Monday, and said he “rejects everything” about the allegations, Latvian state TV reported. The country’s anti-corruption agency said it suspects Rimsevics of “seeking a large-scale bribe” and has started a criminal investigation.

The high-stakes drama unfolded Saturday, when Rimsevics was detained upon arriving for questioning at the office of Latvia’s anti-corruption agency, and was interviewed for eight hours into the night, his lawyer told state TV. His office and a property were raided, the channel said.

The looming criminal charges against the man who has overseen the country’s banking sector since 1992, in the wake of the Soviet collapse, has plunged the small Baltic nation into turmoil.

Rimsevics’ detention is particularly sensitive as he sits on the top policy making council of the ECB, Europe’s most powerful financial institution, and is privy to the state secrets of Latvia, NATO and the European Union.

Any connections to money laundering would raise concerns of the risk of blackmail from Russia’s secret services or organized crime, and come at a time when Latvian security services warn that Russia is actively trying to obtain state secrets from Latvian state officials to weaken the United States and the European Union.

Latvia, a Baltic state of only 2 million people on the eastern fringes of the EU, is trying to cope with the latest development in a history of banking scandals.

The president called a meeting of the National Security Council. The finance minister said Rimsevics should step down from his position for the good of the country while the investigation proceeds, but noted that lawmakers do not have authority to remove him since the central bank is politically independent.

The Bank of Latvia and the ECB declined to comment on Rimsevics’ arrest.

Latvia has become infamous for money laundering since the high-profile Magnitsky scandal, in which $230 million in Russian taxpayers’ money was siphoned off, largely through Latvian banks, according to U.S. and European authorities. Whistleblower Sergei Magnitsky was imprisoned in Russia in 2008 and allegedly beaten and denied medical care, leading to his death. The U.S. and EU sanctioned Russian individuals over the case.

In 2014, a trove of leaked documents, the so-called Laundromat reports by the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project, detailed how $20 billion were sent from Russia, largely through Latvia, in 2010-2014. Latvian banks then went through an independent audit last year, after which Latvian regulators levied fines against 3 banks for a total of 640,000 euros.

Barely one week later, France fined Latvian bank Rietumu 80 million euros for money laundering. Major global banks, meanwhile, have stopped making dollar transactions with Latvian banks after the Laundromat’s leaked documents illustrated how dirty money had reached firms like Deutsche Bank by way of Latvian banks. Last week, the U.S. Treasury singled out one of Latvia’s biggest banks, ABLV, for having “institutionalized money laundering” and the ECB on Monday blocked ABLV from making any payments amid concerns about its finances.

All of this happened on the watch of Rimsevics, who has been at the top of Latvia’s banking system for about as long as the country has been independent from the Soviet Union. He became chairman in 1992 and then governor, the top policymaking role, in 2001. While everyday oversight of banks is managed by a specific regulator, the FCMC, its chairman is nominated by Rimsevics. The current banking regulator, Peters Putnins, also worked under Rimsevics for years at the central bank, official records show.

So the accusations of extortion by the Latvian bank Norvik hit at the heart of power in Latvia and the ECB.

“The high level official mentioned in our request for arbitration is Rimsevics,” the CEO of Norvik bank, Oliver Bramwell, told the AP.

The bank’s majority shareholder and chairman, Grigory Guselnikov, confirmed that Rimsevics is the official named in the complaint, which was filed to a unit of the World Bank that manages disputes between investors and states and was obtained by the AP.

Rimsevics, Guselnikov says, has regularly demanded bribes through a middleman since 2015, threatening to hit his bank with tougher regulations if he did not comply. These, he was told, were the “rules of the game” in Latvia.

The complaint filed by Norvik and Guselnikov says that “this Senior Latvian Official has taken advantage of the FCMC’s regulatory measures as a goad to extort monetary bribes from the Claimants, and has both personally, and through intermediaries, sought repeatedly to extort money from Mr Guselnikov.”



Guselnikov grew up in the Russian region of Siberia and began working in banking before moving to London, from where he eventually bought Norvik. He got some attention in London in 2011 when he bought the Rolex luxury watch flagship store at One Hyde Park, an ultra-wealthy address of the British capital.

In a series of interviews with AP, Guselnikov laid out his story.

Guselnikov said he first met Rimsevics in 2015 after he was introduced to a man called Renars Kokins, who was said to know the country’s legal and political landscape well. Kokins invited Guselnikov to a meeting in a large villa in the suburbs of the capital surrounded by CCTV cameras. Soon after Guselnikov got there, another man arrived, on foot, and entered the house without knocking: it was Rimsevics, the head of the central bank and the country’s top financial official.

He was brief and to the point. He told Guselnikov that he could help him because the nation’s financial regulator was loyal to him personally. All he had to do was “cooperate” with Kokins, Guselnikov recalled.

Rimsevics left no more than 10 minutes later and Kokins sat Guselnikov down at a table. He pulled a pen out and wrote on a piece of paper: “100,000 per month.”

Kokins did not use the word “payment.” He explained to the banker that all Latvian banks “cooperate” in this manner.

After that meeting, Guselnikov, a U.K. and Russian citizen, decided not to pay, fearing that once he paid a bribe he would forever be blackmailed for more cash. And he did not return messages and calls from Kokins.

About a year later, Guselnikov’s brother invited him to a new friend’s birthday party. Arriving to the party, he found that his brother’s new friend was none other than Kokins, who again approached Guselnikov about the need to “cooperate.”

In the following weeks, Guselnikov tried to stall but found that every time he refused to pay, his bank would get hit with new regulatory measures. The legal complaint lists these measures as sudden increases in the amount of capital the bank needed to hold, forcing it to write down the value of assets.

These events, the complaint says, “created leverage which the Senior Latvian Official was able to deploy in his attempts to extort money from the Claimants.”

Guselnikov says he met with Kokins and Rimsevics a few more times to try to clarify his position and with each meeting, Rimsevics was increasingly impatient and said that if Guselnikov did not cooperate, his bank would be hit with enough regulatory problems to put it out of business.

Rimsevics took great care to not be seen at these meetings, Guselnikov says.

On one occasion, Kokins drove Guselnikov around the Latvian capital, Riga, for almost two hours before parking in front of a Chinese restaurant in the city outskirts. Kokins left the car and minutes later, Rimsevics entered it and sat behind Guselnikov, in the back seat, to speak for a few minutes, Guselnikov said. Another time they met in the restaurant itself, when it was completely empty.

“It was a nightmare for me for years,” said Guselnikov, who is 41. “You can’t understand how to get out of this dirty environment without reputation damage. That is why I decided to go out publicly and legally with my case. I can lose the bank, my money, but I will never become part of it.”

The AP sought to interview about a dozen officials in Latvia’s banking and state sector about Rimsevics. None would comment on the record.



Guselnikov says that Kokins did not only ask him for bribes, he wanted Norvik Bank to launder money. At one meeting, Kokins suggested that Norvik bank allow the transit of $100 million from Russia, and keep $1 million as a payment for the service. He said the transfer would be arranged by a man named German Miloush from Russia.

Kokins and Miloush were partners in business, according to corporate filings that show Kokins worked for Miloush’s BMW dealership in Riga, signing annual reports.

Miloush himself is an internationally wanted criminal. He was convicted in 2007 in Latvia for bribing politicians and fled the country. Ten years later, he was arrested on an Interpol warrant upon arriving in Cyprus, an EU member state, from Moscow.

Once again, he fled. He reportedly failed to show up for a Sept. 5 court date in 2017 and has been at large since. Latvia’s anti-corruption agency did not reply to repeated requests for comment on Miloush’s status.

Russian border records obtained by the AP show that Kokins flew from Moscow to Cyprus just before Miloush dodged his extradition hearing. The data, which could not be independently verified by the AP, also show Kokins has been travelling about once a month to Russia, sometimes only for a few hours, since at least 2010.

The data also show Rimsevics has visited Russia regularly in recent years — making at least 8 trips since 2010. Most of those were before Latvia was allowed into the EU’s currency union, the euro, in 2014 and before the invasion of the Crimean Peninsula that triggered Western sanctions against Russia. After that, the data show Rimsevics visited Russia via Belarus, a neighboring Russian ally that shares border data with Moscow.

On one trip, in 2010, Rimsevics went on what appears to be a hunting trip, according to photos obtained by the AP. In one of the photos, he is pictured with Dmitry Pilshchikov, who was then the head of the Research Institute of Information Technology, a Russia-owned military tech company later sanctioned by the U.S.

The photo suggests a friendly gathering in a wood cabin: conversation and laughter around a meal, a bottle of liquor and instant coffee. A guitar lies on the table and an assault rifle hangs on the wall.

Pilshchikov’s boss at the time of the photo was Sergey Chemezov, an old-time ally and friend of Vladimir Putin since the 1980s. After the Crimean invasion, the company was sanctioned by the U.S. Chemezov continues to run Russia’s main arms conglomerate, Rostec.

Mark Galeotti, a senior research fellow at the Institute of International Relations Prague and an expert on Russian financial crime, says that the optics of the trip aren’t good for someone in Rimsevics’ position.

“It’s not the same as if he were running a taxi company,” Galeotti said.

The risk of blackmail is particularly high in the case of Russia, which he says actively tries to leverage foreign officials through corruption. Putin has in recent years sought to re-impose Russian influence in Eastern Europe, where countries like Latvia and Ukraine have tried to shake off Moscow’s power and align themselves more closely with the EU and U.S.

“They regard corruption as a way of exerting influence,” Galeotti says of Russia and its secret services, which he says largely controls the business of money laundering out of Russia.

In the case of Rimsevics, the risk is also high given the state secrets he has access to. As a member of the ECB’s governing council, he is privy to market-moving data and shapes decisions at the central bank, which sets monetary policy for the 19 EU countries that use the euro. The way the governing council is set up, Rimsevics, as the Latvian member, has one vote on policy matters like interest rates or monetary stimulus programs — the same as officials from the biggest nations like Germany or France.

And as a top official in Latvia he has access to confidential NATO and EU information, such as war preparation plans, secret services’ reports and the state of vital infrastructure.

Latvia’s own secret services said in its last annual review that Russia is targeting the country’s state officials and is after state secrets. In particular, they say that “Russia’s security services will increase their focus on residents of Latvia making private or official visits to Russia or who have contacts with Russian subjects.”



Faced with insistent demands for payoffs and retaliation for not “cooperating”, Guselnikov said he felt he had no choice but to resort to international legal action because the problems in Latvia seemed insurmountable.

The Magnitsky case of 2008 was the first of many scandals to rock Latvia and its economy.

Shortly after Magnitsky was imprisoned, a Latvian bank called Parex became a funnel for money laundering and easy cash for politically-connected individuals, according to documents in the so-called Panama Papers, a global investigative series. Among many murky deals was a $100 million loan, against no collateral, to Zhan Khudainatov, the CEO of Russian gas company Severneft, and his brother Eduard, deputy CEO and later CEO of Russian state oil company Rosneft. The Khudainatovs defaulted on $78 million to Parex despite selling assets for $403 million in 2012, according to the OCCRP.

This defaulted loan, on top of others, contributed to Parex bank’s failure in 2008. The Latvian state rescued the bank at a cost of about $1 billion dollars, a colossal sum for Latvia. It was one of the biggest costs in a national financial crisis that increased Latvia’s national debt burden six-fold, required a bailout from the International Monetary Fund and ultimately saw a tenth of the population emigrate in search of a better life.

John Christmas, a former employee of Parex bank, said he alerted Rimsevics as far back as 2005, detailing how Parex was operating illegally and not carrying out proper checks on its loans.

“They refused to talk to me,” he says. Instead, he says he began receiving death threats and had to flee the country.

“Latvia isn’t fighting against money laundering,” Christmas said. “Latvia is doing the opposite, fighting to protect the money launderers.”
Anything Forums About Latvian Girls And Around / Anything / Anti Russian Rhetoric - Paranoia or...? Top
Your Reply Click this icon to move up to the quoted message

» Username  » Password 
You can post anonymously by entering a nickname with no password (if that nickname has not been taken by another member) or by leaving both fields empty. If you have an account you can also log in from this page without posting a message.

© 2007-2023 Forums About Latvian Girls And Around Powered by Free Forum Software miniBB ® Made with Love.
Content pages cannot be republished, or reproduced, without prior written consent of this project owners.
You are free to link to any of the pages on this site from anywhere. Read Privacy & Terms before usage.